[3dem] [ccpem] Resolution estimation

Carlos Oscar S. Sorzano coss at cnb.csic.es
Sun Jun 16 04:32:52 PDT 2019


Dear all,


we have also seen very often these disagreeing measurements of 
resolution depending on the mask being used. In our experience, MonoRes 
tends to provide a number that is less biased than other measures. To 
use MonoRes you need either two half maps (the preferred option) or a 
map and a mask (outside this mask there should be noise that is supposed 
to be of the same nature as the noise inside the mask).


Kind regards, Carlos Oscar


El 14/06/2019 a las 11:09, Mohamed A Sayed escribió:
>
> Hello
>
>  Sorry just for clarification "get 0.x Ang lower resolution compared 
> to Resmap". I really meant that I got two numbers for the same map. I 
> realize that the map quality itself did not change. Thank you
>
> Best regards
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Collaborative Computational Project in Electron 
> cryo-Microscopy <CCPEM at JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of Egelman, Edward H 
> (ehe2n) <egelman at VIRGINIA.EDU>
> *Sent:* Friday, June 14, 2019 1:44 AM
> *To:* CCPEM at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Subject:* Re: [ccpem] Resolution estimation
>
> Hi,
>
>   I feel compelled to make a comment. When people say that the map has 
> improved (or worsened) by 0.x Å after doing something, do they ever 
> actually look at the map? Or even the FSC curve? Or are they simply 
> looking at the value where FSC=0.143? I think that the most important 
> thing is actually the appearance of the map, and many experienced 
> people have realized that many things can be done to improve or 
> degrade the FSC without changing the overall appearance of the map.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed
>
> Edward Egelman
>
> Harrison Distinguished Professor
>
> Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics
>
> University of Virginia
>
> phone: 434-924-8210
>
> fax: 434-924-5069
>
> egelman at virginia.edu
>
> www.people.virginia.edu/~ehe2n <http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ehe2n>
>
> *From: *Collaborative Computational Project in Electron 
> cryo-Microscopy <CCPEM at JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of Takanori Nakane 
> <tnakane at MRC-LMB.CAM.AC.UK>
> *Reply-To: *Takanori Nakane <tnakane at MRC-LMB.CAM.AC.UK>
> *Date: *Friday, June 14, 2019 at 6:32 AM
> *To: *"CCPEM at JISCMAIL.AC.UK" <CCPEM at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> *Subject: *Re: [ccpem] Resolution estimation
>
> Hi,
>
> ResMap and RELION use different algorithms to estimate local resolution.
>
> They are not necessarily comparable.
>
> (ResMap tends to be more optimistic in my experience)
>
> > Sorry is there any short anwer for how to make the mask less tight.
>
> Please apply low pass filtering at 15 A and add more soft
>
> edges in MaskCreate.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Takanori Nakane
>
> On 2019/06/13 23:25, Mohamed A Sayed wrote:
>
>     Hi Takanori,
>
>     Thank you for your help. This may answer the FSC curve but even
>     when I use Relion to determine the local resolution on the
>     unfiltered refined 3D model I get 0.4 Ang lower resolution
>     compared to Resmap.
>
>     I used b-factor from post processing and k2 correction curve.
>
>     Sorry is there any short anwer for how to make the mask less
>     tight. Thank you
>
>     ________________________________________
>
>     From: Takanori Nakane <tnakane at mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
>     <mailto:tnakane at mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>>
>
>     Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 9:44 PM
>
>     To: Mohamed A Sayed;
>
>     Subject: Re: [ccpem] Resolution estimation
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Probably your mask is too tight and/or sharp.
>
>     Please look at Note 4.16 of
>
>     ftp://ftp.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/pub/scheres/multibody_protocol.pdf.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Takanori Nakane
>
>     On 2019/06/13 19:27, Mohamed A Sayed wrote:
>
>         ​Hello,
>
>         I hope you would please advise on the following:
>
>         When I apply post processing in Relion on a refined 3D map,
>         the FSC
>
>         curve gives 0.3 Angstrom worse resolution than that before
>         post processing.
>
>         If I use Resmap v 1.95 to estimate the resolution from the
>
>         unfiltered half maps of the refined model, the resolution is 0.4 A
>
>         better than when I use the resolution estimation from Relion
>         on the same
>
>         unfiltered half map.
>
>         - Which value to believe?
>
>         - How to calculate FSC without post processing ?
>
>         - What caused the post processing to give lower resolution and
>
>         resolution estimation to be lower?
>
>         Can you please point out for a source on how to reliably fit a
>         pdb into
>
>         an cryo map?
>
>         Thank you very much for your help and time.
>
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link:
>
>         https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1
>
>     ########################################################################
>
>     To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link:
>
>     https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link:
>
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1
>
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos Oscar Sánchez Sorzano                  e-mail:   coss at cnb.csic.es
Biocomputing unit                             http://i2pc.es/coss
National Center of Biotechnology (CSIC)
c/Darwin, 3
Campus Universidad Autónoma (Cantoblanco)     Tlf: 34-91-585 4510
28049 MADRID (SPAIN)                          Fax: 34-91-585 4506
------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/pipermail/3dem/attachments/20190616/d23d1e82/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the 3dem mailing list