[3dem] Vacuum carbon coater

Fang Zhao fang.zhao at helsinki.fi
Sat Oct 11 21:43:21 PDT 2014


I would support EMS 150, for its option of using both carbon rod and carbon
tread as carbon sources.

Not an owner of Cressington 208C. The web description of 208C mentioned
carbon rod as its only carbon source, no carbon thread (carbon wire, or
carbon fiber as answer 3 said).  This might be a shortcoming.  Carbon rod is
a must-be if you need thick, repeated coating. For TEM grids, you never need
repeated, thick coating.
For thin coating, a thread is more appropriate. It is more gentle, even, and
no risk of producing small carbon bits or damage thin supporting film on
your grids. Thread allows only one coating as the thread breaks shortly
after current on. The coating thickness is controlled by the thickness of
thread, single-thread, double-threads, or half-thread, not by time of
coating in contrast of carbon rod. If your device does not allow you to use
carbon tread, you are left with no choice if the rod comes as a problem.

The Edward system seems too big for your purpose.

Fang
--------------------------------------------------------
Fang Zhao, MD. PhD. Unit supervisor
Advanced Microscopy Unit (AMU)
Haartman Institute 
Haartmaninkatu 3
PO Box 21, 00014 University of Helsinki
Finland
Tel. 	Mobile:   +358 50 4484 510
	Lab: +358 50 4482 815
 
E-mail: fang.zhao at helsinki.fi
Web: http://www.hi.helsinki.fi/amu


-----Original Message-----
From: 3dem-bounces at ncmir.ucsd.edu [mailto:3dem-bounces at ncmir.ucsd.edu] On
Behalf Of 3dem-request at ncmir.ucsd.edu
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 22:00
To: 3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu
Subject: 3dem Digest, Vol 86, Issue 
Send 3dem mailing list submissions to
	3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	3dem-request at ncmir.ucsd.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	3dem-owner at ncmir.ucsd.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of 3dem digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Vacuum (carbon) coating systems (duncan.sousa at rcn.com)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:57:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: duncan.sousa at rcn.com
To: 3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu
Subject: [3dem] Vacuum (carbon) coating systems
Message-ID: <852021518.1718606.1412715472911.JavaMail.root at rcn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Dear Colleagues, 

The Biological Science Imaging Resource at FSU is looking to buy a new
vacuum coating system. It will primarily be used for making thin carbon for
TEM, but we would also like it for rotary shadowing and sputter coating for
SEM applications as well. Any advice on current systems would be
appreciated. One warning I've had is that switching between SEM sputter
coating and carbon evaporation may not be ideal, but I don't know how
problematic it may be. I have listed a few systems we are considering below
(as well as some comments on coating systems from 2012 at the bottom). 

Cressington Systems: 
328UHR Ultra High Resolution EM Coating System 208C High Vacuum Turbo Carbon
Coater 208HR High Resolution Sputter Coater for FE-SEM
http://www.tedpella.com/cressington_html/Cressington-Introduction.htm 

EMS Systems: 
EMS150TES
http://www.emsdiasum.com/microscopy/products/equipment/turbo_evaporator.aspx


Edwards System: 
HHV Auto306
http://www.hhvltd.com/html/p_auto306.html 


Sincerely, 
Duncan 
__________________________________
Duncan Sousa, Ph. D. 
BSIR Coordinator 
Department of Biological Science
Florida State University
89 Chieftan Way, Rm 119
Tallahassee, Fl. 32306 



Answer 1 

We bought the Cresington 208C carbon evaporator about a year ago. 

http://www.cressington.com/product_208c.html 

We are quite happy with the system. It is reliable and easy to operate. 
We also bought the thickness monitor although we do not find it very 
useful. We often trust better our traditional method of folding a piece 
of filter paper to cash a white shadow that does not get cover by 
carbon. 

The glow discharge accessory is pretty convenient, fast and easy to 
use. If budget allows I would recommend to purchase the system with the 
dry vacuum pumping system comprised of the turbo pump and a Dry Scroll 
Pump. It will make your system completely oil free and will prevent oil 
mist contamination of your grids. 

Answer 2 

We also bought the Cressington carbon coater 208 recently and I can 
fully support Joaquins statement. We have it also with the thickness 
monitor but also think that it is not essential to have it. We don't 
have the glow discharge from that company so I can not judge on that. 

Answer 3 

We have many happy customers using the EMS 150 Series of Coaters. It is 
a very modern and flexible instrument for a good value. You can buy it 
as a rotary- or turbo-pumped system, with carbon-rod and/or carbon-fiber 
source. It is possible to upgrade it with Sputter-, Evaporation-, 
Aperture-Cleaning- and Glow-Discharge inserts. It always uses the same 
base system, vacuum and control unit, therefore it is very flexible and 
favorable. 

What would you like to coat? - For high-purity carbon, as used for 
coating grids, the turbo-pumped, high-vacuum system is a must. We 
recommend using a good two to four stage membrane pump as roughing pump. 
It is clean, silent, basically maintenance-free, very reliable and cost 
efficient. Coating just for conductivity is not a big issue and a rotary 
pumped system can be used. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/pipermail/3dem/attachments/20141007/68feb34b/att
achment-0001.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
3dem mailing list
3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu
https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem


End of 3dem Digest, Vol 86, Issue 6
***********************************



More information about the 3dem mailing list