[3dem] glow discharge vs plasma cleaning

Sergej Masich Sergej.Masich at ki.se
Tue Sep 20 10:03:34 PDT 2016


Dear List, dear Benoît,
I have some different experience that can be wrong though. A colleague and a good friend of mine from Albuquerque successfully used his plasma cleaner to glow-discharge carbon films. I decided to copy his settings in our Lab and ordered the same model. However, that model could not be sold to European customers due to some regulations. I purchased more expensive model from the same supplier. It did not work! As the result of “glow discharge”, I got empty grids, no traces of carbon. To make a long story short, we installed a needle valve and a gauge to control the vacuum degree. We got hydrophilic carbon at poorer vacuum and no carbon at better vacuum. Since then, I used the plasma cleaner for many years to prepare hydrophilic carbon surface.
In my opinion, this also makes sense. The ions in plasma have longer free path at higher vacuum. As the result, they have higher energy that can result in more efficient removal of the “dirt” from the surface.
I never read any confirmation of my “theory” that can be completely wrong but I hope it will contribute to the discussion.
Sincerely,
Sergej Masich
=============================
Dr. Sergej Masich
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology
Karolinska Institutet
Box 285
171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
tel: (+)46 - 8 - 524 873 61
mobile: (+)46 - 736 - 833 693
e-mail: Sergej.Masich at ki.se<mailto:Sergej.Masich at ki.se>

On 20 Sep 2016, at 18:33, <benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch<mailto:benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch>> <benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch<mailto:benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch>> wrote:

Hi David,

This could be right. However I doubt it. Within 20 to 30 minutes we can completely disintegrate the carbon of quantifoil grids with the glow discharge machine set so that it glows strongly without sparkling.

Cheers
Ben

________________________________________
Von: Morgan, David Gene [dagmorga at indiana.edu<mailto:dagmorga at indiana.edu>]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. September 2016 18:12
An: Zuber, Benoît (ANA); 3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu<mailto:3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu>
Betreff: Re: glow discharge vs plasma cleaning

Ben,


   Maybe someone else on the list can shed some light on this, but I don't know whether the strength of the plasma created in an EM "glow discharge device" is comparable to that of what is called a "plasma cleaner."  I suspect not, but could be wrong.


   That said, over zealous use of a plasma cleaner can remove _all_ the carbon from an EM grid (I have done this with a lacy carbon grid), so having too much power can be a bad thing...


--
           David Gene Morgan
       Electron Microscopy Center
            047D Simon Hall
            IU Bloomington
         812 856 1457 (office)
         812 856 3221 (3200)
     http://iubemcenter.indiana.edu
________________________________
From: benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch<mailto:benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch> <benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch<mailto:benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:06 PM
To: Morgan, David Gene; 3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu<mailto:3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu>
Subject: Re: glow discharge vs plasma cleaning

Hi David and Luiza,

Many thanks for the explanations. OK this « makes sense ». But it is a shame that people use two different words for the same thing (good job from the marketing team though ! ). It would be much better to use only one term and then give specific gaz conditions. So many people are convinced that glow discharge and plasma cleaning are two different things and that you need two different machines.
We have a so-called glow discharge machine from defunct Balzers. It still functions perfectly well, it looks like what people describe as a glow discharge machine : a glass cylinder with two metal plates below and on top, and it has an needle-valve inlet. We typically let the inlet in contact with the air and let a tiny bit of air flow in to get a constant pressure in the chamber and thereby have a reproducible procedure. We can quite precisely control the pressure that we want inside. However if we want to use whatever gas mixture instead of good old nitrogen and oxygen, we can just buy and connect the relevant gas bottle(s). No need to purchase a new machine.
If I listened to what so many people told me, I would have long bought another machine, which would probably have been a waste of money and lab space. I think people should be more aware of this before spending their (tax payer ?) money.

Cheers
Benoît


De : "Morgan, David Gene" <dagmorga at indiana.edu<mailto:dagmorga at indiana.edu>>
Date : mardi, 20 septembre 2016 17:51
À : Benoit Zuber <benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch<mailto:benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch>>
Objet : Re: glow discharge vs plasma cleaning


Ben,



   They are technically the same thing _except_ that in common EM usage, "glow discharge" is done using ambient gases (i.e., you just pull a modest vacuum and create a plasma) while "plasma cleaning" is done using a specific mix of gases (Ar, O and with the Gatan device H) instead of ambient gases (i.e., you flush the chamber with specific gases, then pull the vacuum and create the plasma).



   With more O in the plasma, the cleaning tends to be stronger (burns more material in the sample) and the Ar/O mix prevents side reactions that can be caused by the abundant N in the atmosphere.


--
           David Gene Morgan
       Electron Microscopy Center
            047D Simon Hall
            IU Bloomington
         812 856 1457 (office)
         812 856 3221 (3200)
     http://iubemcenter.indiana.edu
________________________________
From: 3dem <3dem-bounces at ncmir.ucsd.edu<mailto:3dem-bounces at ncmir.ucsd.edu>> on behalf of benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch<mailto:benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch> <benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch<mailto:benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:28 AM
To: 3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu<mailto:3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu>
Subject: [3dem] glow discharge vs plasma cleaning

Dear colleagues,

I often hear people saying: „Did you treat your grid with glow discharge or with plasma cleaner?” Or : ”It is absolutely essential for application XY to pretreat the grid with a plasma cleaner and not by glow discharge!”.

Can anyone explain what the difference between glow discharge and a plasma cleaning is?

According to Wikipedia, this is the same thing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glow_discharge). The page starts with this sentence:
“A glow discharge is a plasma<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)> formed by the passage of electric current<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_current> through a low-pressure gas”

I look forward to an interesting debate.
Ben

Prof. Benoît Zuber
Institute of Anatomy
University of Bern
Baltzerstrasse 2
Postfach 922
3000 Bern 9
Switzerland
Tel. +41 31 631 84 40
benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch<mailto:benoit.zuber at ana.unibe.ch>
http://www.ana.unibe.ch/~exmo/

_______________________________________________
3dem mailing list
3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu<mailto:3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu>
https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/pipermail/3dem/attachments/20160920/9af836a1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the 3dem mailing list