[3DEM] Interpolation of scanned images

[Pawel A Penczek]

The first one is correct, the second is incorrect.

Regards,
Pawel Penczek.



Kasim Sader wrote:
> **** Messages to this list are automatically archived ***
> **** Please limit quoting of previous postings to the bare minimum ****
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am trying to reduce the resolution of my scanned images while 
> retaining the maximum signal possible.  Does anyone have advice on which 
> method would be best?  The SPIDER   manual suggests fourier filtration 
> (FQ) followed by decimation (DC- is this the same as a nearest neighbor 
> reduction?).  However, I have read a paper that used 2-fold binning of 
> the scanned data- is the decimation with summation of neighbouring 
> pixels (DC S) operation the same as binning?  How do the two methods of 
> reduction compare?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kasim Sader
> 
> -- 
> For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe/etc., send mail to
> 3dem-request at 3dem.ucsd.edu with the text "help" in the body of the
> message.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Pawel.A.Penczek.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 343 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/pipermail/3dem/attachments/20051013/6b933e14/Pawel.A.Penczek.vcf