[3DEM] Interpolation of scanned images
Pawel A Penczek
Pawel.A.Penczek at uth.tmc.edu
Thu Oct 13 11:25:29 PDT 2005
The first one is correct, the second is incorrect.
Regards,
Pawel Penczek.
Kasim Sader wrote:
> **** Messages to this list are automatically archived ***
> **** Please limit quoting of previous postings to the bare minimum ****
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to reduce the resolution of my scanned images while
> retaining the maximum signal possible. Does anyone have advice on which
> method would be best? The SPIDER manual suggests fourier filtration
> (FQ) followed by decimation (DC- is this the same as a nearest neighbor
> reduction?). However, I have read a paper that used 2-fold binning of
> the scanned data- is the decimation with summation of neighbouring
> pixels (DC S) operation the same as binning? How do the two methods of
> reduction compare?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kasim Sader
>
> --
> For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe/etc., send mail to
> 3dem-request at 3dem.ucsd.edu with the text "help" in the body of the
> message.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Pawel.A.Penczek.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 343 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/pipermail/3dem/attachments/20051013/6b933e14/Pawel.A.Penczek.vcf
More information about the 3dem
mailing list