<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    At the risk of merely echoing some of Steve's comments, I would like
    to say that while journals will not necessarily use your recommended
    reviewers, they will almost always honor your reasonable requests to
    exclude certain reviewers. This undercuts any reason to be paranoid,
    unless you think that there are many people who will unethically use
    your map.<br>
    Ed<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/30/15 6:13 PM, Ludtke, Steven J
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:8AF4CB4D-9F57-4C06-8D0A-22CF65911C51@bcm.edu"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      I'm not sure if endless echoing is going to be that worthwhile,
      but I'll add that I have been involved in a couple of reviews
      where not only were final maps required, but a reviewer (not me)
      actually requested the raw data (or a portion of the raw data)
      involved in the reconstruction! I know I am not alone in seeing
      cases like this. Admittedly in these cases, the editor did seem a
      bit taken aback, but still followed through after discussing with
      the author.
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">I cannot see that one has any ground to stand upon
        in refusing to submit their final map to reviewers. In theory
        the paper should encompass the entire results of the study. The
        fact that it isn't possible to fully represent the data in the
        publication itself doesn't negate the philosophical point.
        Either you are ready to release your result to the world or you
        aren't. Publishing isn't about hiding things, it's about
        spreading your new knowledge as widely as possible. Given the
        requirement to deposit to the EMDB, at most this gives the
        reviewer a brief lead on general public access. The 'hold past
        publication' policy in the databases is transitioning out
        anyway. The excuse that "it took me 3 years to solve the
        structure and it will take me another 2 years to really dissect
        the map" is fading as cryoEM is becoming a higher throughput
        technique. The idea that you so mistrust your colleagues that
        you would require an MTA for the review process is completely
        ludicrous. If there are IP concerns about a particular result,
        you should not publish it until you are ready to share with the
        world. I, for one, have no problem in forgoing my anonymity in
        the review process, as journals like eLife promote, but I can at
        least understand the value in being permitted to remain
        anonymous. If there are specific colleagues that you fear will
        misuse your data, you should identify them in the cover letter
        to the editor with your reasoning, and trust the ethics of the
        editor.
        <div class=""><br class="">
          <div>
            <blockquote type="cite" class="">
              <div class="">On Apr 30, 2015, at 4:46 PM, Gabriel Lander
                <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:glander@scripps.edu" class="">glander@scripps.edu</a>>
                wrote:</div>
              <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
              <div class="">
                <div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
                  space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"
                  class="">
                  I would like to echo Eva & Ed’s comments (I am
                  also NOT a reviewer).
                  <div class="">Given that the EM field hasn’t really
                    settled on a robust methodology to statistically
                    assess the accuracy & validity of a density (yes
                    we have gold standard FSC, local resolution plots,
                    tilt-pair validation, etc. but these are not 100%
                    foolproof, & there are ways to inflate
                    resolution nonetheless), we generally rely on our
                    eyes to ascertain the quality of map.</div>
                  <div class=""><br class="">
                  </div>
                  <div class="">I’m sure your density doesn’t fall into
                    this category of “inaccurate” structure
                    determination, so I’m curious what you think a
                    reviewer might do with your density to misuse it?</div>
                  <div class="">I agree with Ed that all densities
                    should be uploaded with a submitted manuscript, and
                    I am happy to do this for any manuscripts we send
                    out.</div>
                  <div class="">-gabe</div>
                  <div class=""><br class="">
                  </div>
                  <div class=""><br class="">
                  </div>
                  <div class="">
                    <div class="">
                      <blockquote type="cite" class="">
                        <div class="">On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Eva
                          Nogales <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:enogales@lbl.gov" class="">enogales@lbl.gov</a>>
                          wrote:</div>
                        <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                        <div class="">
                          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class=""><font
                              class="" face="Helvetica Neue">Hi
                              Friedrich,<br class="">
                              <br class="">
                              We got the same request and we provided
                              the map and model as a Chimera session to
                              the editor and reviewer. I understand your
                              point, but we have to trust the system and
                              understand where the reviewers may be
                              coming from. We do know of more than one
                              example where having had such access  may
                              have precluded publication of</font><font
                              class="" face="Helvetica Neue"><font
                                class="" face="Helvetica Neue"> some
                                really terrible structures</font>. It
                              will be interesting to hear what others
                              think (and I have no doubt the reviewer(s)
                              that asked for your and our maps is/are
                              within the list reading this email...)<br
                                class="">
                              <br class="">
                              Eva<br class="">
                            </font><br class="">
                            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/30/15 1:49
                              PM, Friedrich Foerster wrote:<br class="">
                            </div>
                            <blockquote
cite="mid:CALtyCEgzVd4vo8Hp+W0CsGh0jhYnFC+ONCNtDBEbRkyLr7+aEQ@mail.gmail.com"
                              type="cite" class="">
                              <div dir="ltr" class="">
                                <div class="">
                                  <div class="">
                                    <div class="">
                                      <div class="">
                                        <div class="">dear colleagues,<br
                                            class="">
                                          <br class="">
                                        </div>
                                        i would be interested in
                                        experiences / suggestions /
                                        views of others in the field on 
                                        the following issue that may be
                                        of interest to many of us:<br
                                          class="">
                                      </div>
                                      the editor of our manuscript
                                      forwarded the request of a
                                      peer-reviewer to access the
                                      cryo-em map of our beloved
                                      complex. this has never happened
                                      to us, but to our surprise the
                                      editor did not consider the
                                      request to be unusual.<br class="">
                                      of course, we share the point that
                                      the map would be of great help in
                                      judging the interpretation of the
                                      data. however, we also feel very
                                      uncomfortable sending the
                                      condensed result of lengthy
                                      research to an anonymous
                                      colleague, who could theoretically
                                      make considerable misuse of it.
                                      nevertheless, the policy of the
                                      journal seems to let us little
                                      choice: "<font class="" size="2">Supporting
                                        data must be made available to
                                        editors and peer</font><font
                                        class="" size="2">-</font><font
                                        class="" size="2">reviewers at
                                        the time of</font><font class=""
                                        size="2"> submission for the
                                        purposes of evaluating the
                                        manuscript.</font><font class=""
                                        size="2"> Peer</font><font
                                        class="" size="2">-</font><font
                                        class="" size="2">reviewers</font><font
                                        class="" size="2"> may be asked</font><font
                                        class="" size="2"> to comment on
                                        the terms of access to
                                        materials, methods and/or data
                                        sets</font><font class=""
                                        size="2">"</font>.<br class="">
                                    </div>
                                    in any case we would be curious
                                    whether others indeed got similar
                                    requests and how they dealt with it.
                                    a good solution for (paranoid?)
                                    people like us could be a good
                                    web-based viewer that lets others
                                    view our map, but i would not know
                                    of such a tool.<br class="">
                                    <br class="">
                                  </div>
                                  Thanks <br class="">
                                  <br class="">
                                </div>
                                Friedrich<br class="" clear="all">
                                <div class=""><br class="">
                                  -- <br class="">
                                  <div class="gmail_signature">Dr.
                                    Friedrich Foerster<br class="">
                                    Max-Planck Institut fuer Biochemie<br
                                      class="">
                                    Am Klopferspitz 18<br class="">
                                    D-82152 Martinsried<br class="">
                                    <br class="">
                                    Tel: +49 89 8578 2632<br class="">
                                    Fax: +49 89 8578 2641<br class="">
                                    <br class="">
                                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                      href="http://www.biochem.mpg.de/foerster"
                                      target="_blank" class="">www.biochem.mpg.de/foerster</a><br
                                      class="">
                                  </div>
                                  <br class="">
                                </div>
                              </div>
                              <br class="">
                              <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                              <br class="">
                              <pre class="" wrap="">_______________________________________________
3dem mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:3dem@ncmir.ucsd.edu">3dem@ncmir.ucsd.edu</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem">https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem</a>
</pre>
                            </blockquote>
                            <br class="">
                            <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
__________________________________________________________________

Eva Nogales
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Molecular and Cell Biology Department
QB3, Stanley Hall 708C
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-3220

Phone: (510) 642-0557           Fax: (510) 666-3336                     
URL: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://cryoem.berkeley.edu/" class="">cryoem.berkeley.edu</a>
(510) 666-3334          Teresa Tucker, Assistant to Eva Nogales

Professor, UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab
__________________________________________________________________
</pre>
                          </div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
                          3dem mailing list<br class="">
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:3dem@ncmir.ucsd.edu" class="">3dem@ncmir.ucsd.edu</a><br
                            class="">
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem"
                            class="">https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem</a><br
                            class="">
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                    </div>
                    <br class="">
                  </div>
                </div>
                _______________________________________________<br
                  class="">
                3dem mailing list<br class="">
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:3dem@ncmir.ucsd.edu" class="">3dem@ncmir.ucsd.edu</a><br
                  class="">
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem">https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem</a><br
                  class="">
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br class="">
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
3dem mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:3dem@ncmir.ucsd.edu">3dem@ncmir.ucsd.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem">https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Edward H. Egelman, Ph.D.
Professor
Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics
University of Virginia

President
Biophysical Society

phone: 434-924-8210
fax: 434-924-5069
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:egelman@virginia.edu">egelman@virginia.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ehe2n">http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ehe2n</a>
</pre>
  </body>
</html>