[3dem] Membrane protein structure: orientation issue

Dmitry Lyumkis dlyumkis at salk.edu
Wed Mar 25 09:41:07 PDT 2020


If it’s a twofold rotationally symmetric object, adhered to the air-water interface along a single “side" view, then a projection along, e.g., phi=0/theta=90 samples the same Fourier plane as the second projection along phi=180/theta=90. The reconstruction will behave in a manner that is identical to one that is composed of exclusively “top” views of a rotationally symmetric object (or, more simply, an asymmetric particle with one preferential orientation, normalizing for the number of asymmetric units). Basically, you’ll end up hyper-sampling around one plane in both cases, except that the planes will lie along distinct axes of the transform. Both are bad cases and, in the absence of other views, will lead to a bad reconstruction. To be clear: this is assuming that there’s only one preferential orientation along the side view of a two-fold rotationally symmetric particle, and not more. If you have 3-fold rotational symmetry, and the sample is adhered to its “side” view, projections separated by phi=120° spacing will lead to sampling of Fourier planes separated by phi=60° (due to symmetry). Effectively, you add two additional planes. Assuming you have enough particles, and there’s a bit of spread in the phi angle, in most practical cases, the reconstruction of a 3-fold rotationally symmetric object will be complete (or nearly so). The higher the rotational symmetry, obviously the better.

To answer the original question, adding top views for your membrane protein will be negligible in the reconstruction. Looks like you should already get a very nice map from the current data. Give it a try.

Best,

Dmitry


Dmitry Lyumkis
Assistant Professor
The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037
T: 858-453-4100 x1155
E: dlyumkis at salk.edu<mailto:dlyumkis at salk.edu>
https://lyumkis.salk.edu






On Mar 25, 2020, at 12:06 AM, Philip Köck <koeck at kth.se<mailto:koeck at kth.se>> wrote:



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/pipermail/3dem/attachments/20200325/baf0ba8d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the 3dem mailing list