[3dem] Which resolution?

[Marin van Heel]

Dear Pawel and All others ....

This 2010 review is - unfortunately - largely based on the flawed
statistics I mentioned before, namely on the a priori assumption that the
inner product of a signal vector and a noise vector are ZERO (an
orthogonality assumption).  The (Frank & Al-Ali 1975) paper we have refuted
on a number of occasions (for example in 2005, and most recently in our
BioRxiv paper) but you still take that as the correct relation between SNR
and FRC (and you never cite the criticism...).
Sorry
Marin

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:42 AM Penczek, Pawel A <
Pawel.A.Penczek at uth.tmc.edu> wrote:

> Dear Teige,
>
> I am wondering whether you are familiar with
>
> Resolution measures in molecular electron microscopy.
> Penczek PA. Methods Enzymol. 2010.
> Citation
>
> Methods Enzymol. 2010;482:73-100. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)82003-8.
>
> You will find there answers to all questions you asked and much more.
>
> Regards,
> Pawel Penczek
>
>
> Regards,
> Pawel
> _______________________________________________
> 3dem mailing list
> 3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu
> https://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/3dem
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ncmir.ucsd.edu/pipermail/3dem/attachments/20200216/67ffa7d3/attachment.html>