[3dem] [Microscopy] mean inner potential

[Philip Köck]

 Hi again.

Thanks for all the input.

I've been looking at the papers suggested by Robert Keyse and Benjamin Himes.
What Spence seems to say is that the contribution to the MIP which is only due to "electrons spilling out a bit further at the surface of a solid" is only around 0.5 V.
The main contribution to the MIP is supposed to be due to adsorbed atoms and molecules.

Bill Tivol quite rightly said that then the MIP would not be a property of a specific material, but would depend a lot on what else is around in the vacuum or what the surface came in contact with.
Are there any experiments on that?

I've also heard the opinion that surface adsorbates contribute only little to the MIP and that it's mainly due to the solid itself.

Then there's still the question of a thickness independent contribution to the phase shift. A tripple surface charge layer like  - + -  with balanced charges could explain that, but where would that come from?

All the best,

Philip


From: Robert Keyse <rok210 at lehigh.edu>
 Sent: Wednesday, 19 June 2019 17:02:11
 To: Philip Köck; microscopy at microscopy.com
 Subject: Re: [Microscopy] mean inner potential


Hi Philip,


the Saldin & Spence paper: Ultramicroscopy 55 (1994) 397-406  suggests the surface atoms are less confined and spread their valence electrons out into the vacuum creating a surface dipole that differs from inside the material.
.  Electrons speed up slightly just as they enter a sample (increase in wave-vector) due to this inner potential.




Reference [12] O'Keefe & Spence: Acta Cryst. (1994) A50, 33-45 (J C H Spence would be a good reference to follow generally)
O'Keefe and Spence estimate the surface potential is weak and only about 0.5 volts (page 39: a back of an envelope estimate).




On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:40 AM <philip.koeck at ki.se> wrote:



 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor:  The Microscopy Society of America
 To  Subscribe/Unsubscribe --  http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
 On-Line Help  http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Thanks for the reference.

 I can't make sense of a thickness-independent contribution to the phase shift either. The way I see it even a surface layer of dipoles would lead to a constant MIP and a phase shift proportional to the thickness.

 One can think of a simple model: A slab of completely neutral material (made of neutrons) covered in a layer of positive charge and outside that a layer of negative charge that balances the positive charge. The potential inside this slab will be constant and  independent of the thickness of the slab.

 I wonder if we can get a comment from someone who knows more.

 All the best,

 Philip




 X-from: 3dem <3dem-bounces at ncmir.ucsd.edu> on behalf of Benjamin Himes <himes.benjamin at gmail.com>
 Sent: Monday, 17 June 2019 20:45:48
 To:  3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu
 Subject: [3dem] (mean Inner potential) Re: 3dem Digest, Vol 142, Issue 38

 Hi Philip,

 The mean inner potential (MIP) refers to a total "interaction" potential that is considered a material property. It consists of all the sources contributing to the potential well seen by an imaging electron, including those you suggest (nuclear and electronic  contributions.)

 Yes, physical changes to the surface via adsorbed matter will directly affect the MIP. I believe the working hypothesis for the source of the "Volta" potential is through heat/exposure related modification of surface adsorbates.

 It is also interesting to note that in addition to the electronic character of the object, the surface contributions of adsorbates and heating, there is another thickness independent phase shift (at least for carbon) the source of which I am not clear on. Happy  to hear an explanation from anyone in the know : )

 Please have a look at this paper where all of the non-Volta contributions are discussed and also measured.

 "Electron holography of thin amorphous carbon films: Measurement of the mean inner potential and a thickness-independent phase shift"

 doi: j.ultramic.2005.10.004

 HTH

 Ben

 ------------------------
 Benjamin Himes








När du skickar e-post till Karolinska Institutet (KI) innebär detta att KI kommer att behandla dina personuppgifter. Här finns information om hur KI behandlar personuppgifter<https://ki.se/medarbetare/integritetsskyddspolicy>.


Sending email to Karolinska Institutet (KI) will result in KI processing your personal data. You can read more about KI’s processing of personal data here<https://ki.se/en/staff/data-protection-policy>.