[3dem] Ceta vs OneView vs F416?

[Reinhard Rachel]

>>> 11.02.2017 at 17:11:
> I guess it depends on your application. 
> If you want to use EPU, Ceta would be better at this moment.
> If you want to do microED, then TVIPS would fit. OneView’s readout speed is

> advantage for a kind of motion correction.

good points, added by Masahide, for this comparison. 
just to add that the TVIPS XF416 is on the market (since 2016), which is the
much faster "sister camera". Full 4k x 4k frame with up to 50fps. - I do not
know how this compares to the other cameras, but this is likely to be
sufficient for many applications in Biology and Mat.sciences, for this budget.

It will also depend on how your users like the one or the other software:
worth testing and comparing. And how the software is suited for your
applications.  
kind regards - Reinhard

-- 
Prof. Dr. Reinhard Rachel
University of Regensburg
Centre for EM / Anatomy
Faculty of Biology & Preclin. Med.
Universitaetsstrasse 31
D-93053 Regensburg - Germany
tel +49 941 943 -2837, -1720
mail reinhard.rachel at biologie.uni-regensburg.de
office: VKL 3.1.29 
 
Next microscopy conferences:
- DGE AK PANOS: Regensburg, 7. April 2017
- Microscopy Conference 2017 (D-A-CH) Lausanne, CH
20-25 August 2017
http://www.mc2017.ch/
- 19th International Microscopy Congress, Sydney; 9-14 Sept 2018
http://imc19.com/
- next Microbiol. conferences: 
VAAM/DGHM - Annual Conf 
March 5-8, 2017, Wuerzburg