[3dem] Breaking of C-flat carbon and vitrification
Shi, Dan (NIH/NCI) [C]
shid at mail.nih.gov
Fri Aug 6 10:49:43 PDT 2010
We had the C film broken problem with C-flat even 400 mesh grids. The company was using thin/slim bar grids to support the fragile carbon film. Those grids are very soft, and most of them were bent when were picked out from the box. I suggested the company to use regular Cu (25 um of bar width for 400 mesh) and thick carbon coating for us. The broken carbon area from either Vitrobot or MRC plunger dramatically decreased since we started using the new C-flat grids with regular Cu grids few months ago. The extra supporting area and stronger frame from the bars seems to hold the carbon film more firmly. Good luck,
From: Bob Grassucci [mailto:rg2502 at columbia.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 12:58 PM
To: M.Karuppasamy at lumc.nl
Cc: 3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [3dem] Breaking of C-flat carbon and vitrification
I had some initial problems with the Mark IV giving reproducible results and it turned out that the zero blot force was never properly calibrated. Once this was done we were able to hone in one reproducible settings with our Quantifoill grids. I would suggest you speak to your FEI service person to make the proper adjustments. One other question is are you sure it is the blotting that breaks your films and not the glow discharging? In the past c-flat grids were known to be less strong than quantifoil. They claim this is no longer the case and it may be so but I can not confirm it from personal experience. Hope this helps.
On 8/6/2010 12:38 PM, M.Karuppasamy at lumc.nl<mailto:M.Karuppasamy at lumc.nl> wrote:
Could you help us on how to get optimal & reproducible (thickness) samples for SP cryo-EM?
We use a FEI vitrobot mark IV, typically with the following blotting parameters: C-flat support, 3.5 ul sample per (30sec glow discharged) grid, 3 sec blotting time, blotting force 3, 100% humidity, RT.
Unfortunately, we frequently notice the breaking of C-flat carbon support during vitrification. Example images are attached.
Only very few meshes are left after vitrification. In those meshes, sample is only found in the middle of the mesh and generally it is still too thick (150->200nm). We played around with blotting parameters but didn't find optimal ones yet for our samples.
Thanks & regards
3dem mailing list
3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu<mailto:3dem at ncmir.ucsd.edu>
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Columbia University Medical Center
Black Building Room 2-221
650 West 168th Street
New York, NY 10032-3702
rg2502 at columbia.edu<mailto:rg2502 at columbia.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the 3dem